Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos107.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan McBride results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Red Herring, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 46.475 hits. Analysis detected 224.475 faulty-reasoning hits from 107.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (16,637 of 26,155 speakers). This Ryan McBride is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Ryan McBride
Speaker details
Total words: 107.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos107.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos