Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Kalember results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 246 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,193 of 28,364 speakers). This Ryan Kalember is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Ryan Kalember
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
29.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.8%34.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos