Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Costello results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Horn Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 30.375 hits. Analysis detected 201.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (12,359 of 26,155 speakers). This Ryan Costello is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Ryan Costello
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
34.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 61.4%61.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 29.0%29.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.7%30.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Horn Effect: Speaker 61.4%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 1.9%Horn EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos