Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Calo results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52.5 hits. Analysis detected 91.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 87.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,739 of 26,969 speakers). This Ryan Calo is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Ryan Calo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
87.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos