Speaker summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos216.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Burge results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 68.332 hits. Analysis detected 194.332 faulty-reasoning hits from 216.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (20,498 of 27,226 speakers). This Ryan Burge is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Ryan Burge
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 216.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
16.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos216.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos