Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video9 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Bradfield results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 9 hits. Analysis detected 9 faulty-reasoning hits from 9 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,714 of 28,364 speakers). This Ryan Bradfield is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Ryan Bradfield
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 9
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos9 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos