Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video311.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruben Puente results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 509.899 faulty-reasoning hits from 311.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (25,345 of 26,781 speakers). This Ruben Puente is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.
Ruben Puente
Speaker details
Total words: 311.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.4% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos311.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 24.7%24.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.2%10.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos