Speaker summary
â 37%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RPCS3 results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Anecdotal, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of â 66% (9,754 of 28,364 speakers). This RPCS3 is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
RPCS3
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0â75%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often