Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roy Behr results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Hindsight Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 212.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,664 of 28,364 speakers). This Roy Behr is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Roy Behr
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos104 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos