Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rough Draft results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 98 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,002 of 28,297 speakers). This Rough Draft is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Rough Draft
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
68.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.8%45.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 54.2%54.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 45.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos