Speaker summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rotten Tomatoes results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,099 of 28,364 speakers). This Rotten Tomatoes is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Rotten Tomatoes
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
51.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 52.4%52.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 47.6%47.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 52.4%52.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 52.4%52.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.4%52.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 47.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos