Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ross Glick results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 266 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,746 of 28,364 speakers). This Ross Glick is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Ross Glick
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos