Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosie Broadley results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 858.64 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,954 of 28,364 speakers). This Rosie Broadley is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Rosie Broadley
Speaker details
Total words: 480
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.0% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos480 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos