Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roscosmos results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Status Quo Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 162.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (14,875 of 27,556 speakers). This Roscosmos is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Roscosmos
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
28.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos