Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ronald Sandler results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 235 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,506 of 26,841 speakers). This Ronald Sandler is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Ronald Sandler
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos