Speaker summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 307.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ron Zonneveld results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Confirmation Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 72 hits . Analysis detected 509.513 faulty-reasoning hits from 307.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (26,019 of 28,324 speakers). This Ron Zonneveld is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Ron Zonneveld
Speaker details
Total words: 307.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos307.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst