Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video86 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ron Brownstein results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 335 faulty-reasoning hits from 86 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,463 of 28,364 speakers). This Ron Brownstein is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Ron Brownstein
Speaker details
Total words: 86
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
64.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos86 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 89.5%89.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 89.5%89.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 89.5%89.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 89.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 89.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 89.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos