Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video93.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roch Cholowsky results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 64.5 hits. Analysis detected 185.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 93.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (15,009 of 28,364 speakers). This Roch Cholowsky is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Roch Cholowsky
Speaker details
Total words: 93.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
29.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos93.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 61.4%61.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.6%13.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 61.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos