Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rocely Gomez results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 43.6% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 323 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,577 of 28,364 speakers). This Rocely Gomez is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Rocely Gomez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
15.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos116 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.6%43.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.6%25.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos