Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video54.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Damas results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 125 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,570 of 28,364 speakers). This Roberto Damas is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Roberto Damas
Speaker details
Total words: 54.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
17.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.2%20.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos