Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberta Metsola results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,403 of 28,364 speakers). This Roberta Metsola is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Roberta Metsola
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
57.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 44.4%44.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos