Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert VerBruggen results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 49% saturation with 38.25 hits. Analysis detected 90.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,866 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert VerBruggen is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Robert VerBruggen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠52%Robert VerBruggen (selected)34%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
33.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 49.0%49.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 24.0%24.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 49.0%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos