Speaker summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos146.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Rueca results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 183 faulty-reasoning hits from 146.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (23,471 of 26,155 speakers). This Robert Rueca is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Robert Rueca
Speaker details
Total words: 146.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.3% percentile
9.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos146.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos