Speaker summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos39.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Hur results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 39.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Hur is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Robert Hur
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 39.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
34.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos39.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos