Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Frazer results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 53.4% saturation with 69.75 hits. Analysis detected 306.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,738 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Frazer is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Robert Frazer
Speaker details
Total words: 116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
25.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos116 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.3%48.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos