Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video113.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Achisson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Pessimism Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 52.9% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 113.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,078 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Achisson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Robert Achisson
Speaker details
Total words: 113.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
35.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos113.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 52.9%52.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.5%26.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos