Speaker summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 154.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Dixon results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Appeal to Authority , and Begging the Question , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 105 hits . Analysis detected 438.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 154.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,371 of 28,364 speakers). This Rob Dixon is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Rob Dixon
Speaker details
Total words: 154.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 17.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos154.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 45.3% 45.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 37.1% 37.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst