Speaker summary
69% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,314.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riley Gaines results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 330.706 hits . Analysis detected 3,089.644 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,314.333 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,651 of 28,364 speakers). This Riley Gaines is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Riley Gaines
Speaker details
Total words: 1,314.333
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score6 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst