Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video96.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rick Brunson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 195.066 faulty-reasoning hits from 96.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,397 of 28,364 speakers). This Rick Brunson is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Rick Brunson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 96.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.1% percentile
21.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos96.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 44.6%44.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.7%25.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.7%25.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos