Speaker summary
ā 78%1 analyzed article/video257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Ojeda results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81.8% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 793.915 faulty-reasoning hits from 257 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ā 31% (19,647 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Ojeda is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Richard Ojeda
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 31%Richard Ojeda (selected)20%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 257
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
19.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos257 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 81.8%81.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.9%7.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 81.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos