Speaker summary
ā 51%2 analyzed articles/videos35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Leon results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 60% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 57 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ā 52% (13,745 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Leon is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Richard Leon
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 52%Richard Leon (selected)34%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
33.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos35 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 60.0%60.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos