Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Gottfried results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 82.5 hits. Analysis detected 247.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (8,664 of 38,479 speakers). This Richard Gottfried is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Richard Gottfried
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠78%Richard Gottfried (selected)63%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos