Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Ellison results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,448 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Ellison is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Richard Ellison
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
16.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos