Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican National Committee’s (RNC) research account results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,587 of 28,364 speakers). This Republican National Committee’s (RNC) research account is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Republican National Committee’s (RNC) research account
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos