Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Representative Jasmine Crockett results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including In-Group Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,582 of 28,364 speakers). This Representative Jasmine Crockett is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Representative Jasmine Crockett
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos