Speaker summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rep. Ted Lieu results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Anecdotal, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 67.1% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 1,013.109 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 21.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,520 of 28,364 speakers). This Rep. Ted Lieu is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Rep. Ted Lieu
Speaker details
Total words: 147
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
21.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos147 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 64.1%64.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 64.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos