Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video71.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renee Everroad results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 309 faulty-reasoning hits from 71.5 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,462 of 28,364 speakers). This Renee Everroad is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Renee Everroad
Speaker details
Total words: 71.5
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
34.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos71.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 80.2%80.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 80.2%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos