Speaker summary
44%1 analyzed article/video181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reginald Ray-Savage results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Indoctrination, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 181 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,591 of 28,364 speakers). This Reginald Ray-Savage is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Reginald Ray-Savage
Speaker details
Total words: 181
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos181 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos