Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reg FOSS desk results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,563 of 28,364 speakers). This Reg FOSS desk is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Reg FOSS desk
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos