Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Cassler results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 51.75 hits. Analysis detected 235.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,680 of 28,364 speakers). This Rebecca Cassler is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Rebecca Cassler
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
55.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos