Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video43.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raymond Santiago results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 184.465 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (7,189 of 37,767 speakers). This Raymond Santiago is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Raymond Santiago
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠81%Raymond Santiago (selected)74%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
73.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 68.5%68.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 63.1%63.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 36.9%36.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 68.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 63.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos