Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ray Nayler results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 726.763 faulty-reasoning hits from 450 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,494 of 28,364 speakers). This Ray Nayler is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Ray Nayler
Speaker details
Total words: 450
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos450 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos