Speaker summary
82%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ray Dlugolecki results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 69.9% saturation with 52.222 hits. Analysis detected 121.222 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (13,909 of 28,364 speakers). This Ray Dlugolecki is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Ray Dlugolecki
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
32.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 69.9%69.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Speaker 69.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos