Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rawan Damen results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,539 of 28,364 speakers). This Rawan Damen is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Rawan Damen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos