Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ravi Thanawala results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 82.3% saturation with 105.333 hits. Analysis detected 461.583 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,591 of 28,364 speakers). This Ravi Thanawala is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Ravi Thanawala
Speaker details
Total words: 128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
46.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos128 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 82.3%82.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 82.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos