Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ravi Coltrane results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 1,142.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (27,889 of 28,130 speakers). This Ravi Coltrane is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Ravi Coltrane
Speaker details
Total words: 1,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos