Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randstad Digital results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,534 of 28,364 speakers). This Randstad Digital is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Randstad Digital
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos