Speaker summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rais Vohra results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 319 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,855 of 28,364 speakers). This Rais Vohra is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Rais Vohra
Speaker details
Total words: 319
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos319 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos