Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rahel Zewude results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,093 of 28,364 speakers). This Rahel Zewude is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Rahel Zewude
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
29.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos