Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video68.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raed Farhan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 157.667 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,248 of 28,364 speakers). This Raed Farhan is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Raed Farhan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
34.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos68.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.3%31.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos